May 14, 2012 dunhamnumber1 Says:
yeah but a veyron could max out everyday and nothing would go wrong.
a gtr has problems with all its owners cuz its cheaply built.
Apr 26, 2012 xzzachzx Says:
you guys do relise if f1 cars needed to go faster they would make them faster, f1 cars barely max out at the end of the longest straight, they dont need a bigger engine, its just extra weight
Apr 6, 2012 jonteesdale18 Says:
WOW WHAT A PIECE OF FUCKING SHIT!!! THESE CARS ARE COMPLETE GARBAGE AND CAPABLE OF NO REAL POWER!!! I WOULD DRAG MY DICK THROUGH A THOUSAND MILES OF BROKEN GLASS BEFORE I WAS FORCED TO DRIVE SUCH INFERIOR CAR!! I OWN A 2000 HONDA CIVIC TURBO AND I PUT 300 TO THE WHEELS AND ONLY WEIGHING 2000LBS I WOULD DESTROY THIS PILE OF SHIT!! YOUR CARS LAME FUCKING FAGGOT!!!!!
Apr 5, 2012 maltonbranch Says:
Add 30k to a GTR and it will destroy a veyron. Veyrons power to weight ratio is dogshit. too heavy
Mar 27, 2012 V8Paul Says:
Gear an f1 car differently and it will destroy the veyron top speed. Veyron is flash cash motoring with little point to it.
Feb 23, 2012 BluntToy Says:
@PJPs911
F1 is quicker then the veyron everywhere but top speed. not too sure about acceleration, i think the f1 has a better 0-100 but 0-300 i dont know who wins
Feb 21, 2012 Prfactist Says:
It makes no sense to compare an F1 car with a Veyron, an IndyCar or anything because they are designed to do completely different things.
Feb 17, 2012 JonasTh33 Says:
The Veyron is the faster car,
but only on the straights
Dec 29, 2011 jamiroquai01fan Says:
Plus the f1 car was on a wet/damp track haha. :)
Dec 27, 2011 mattieboi4 Says:
An F1 car can accelerate from 0 to 160kph & back to 0 in 4 seconds! Veyron what? It's not even a competition, how can they be mentioned in the same sentence. Try reading then commenting ppl.
Dec 19, 2011 Tommovdv Says:
@MrAngelmann go away amerifag no one is better then murray walker.
Dec 18, 2011 thornrev Says:
when did a mercedes a-class became a fast car
Dec 2, 2011 WeeManDaredevil Says:
@MrAngelmann No non-super car sports car on the planet could come close to one of these
Oct 24, 2011 Zigadiboom Says:
0:08 "Hop-STIG Guitars give staggeringly short breaking distance"
Oct 7, 2011 XcopeS Says:
Well, it looks like there are lots of them here.
Oct 7, 2011 kallo182 Says:
F1 Car = 605Kg / 765Hp
Veyron= 1800Kg/ 1000Hp
F1 Car 0.78Kg/Hp, Veyron 1.8Kg/Hp
Only Clueless 16 year old Children think the Veyron is faster than F1.
Sep 22, 2011 XcopeS Says:
To people arguing about Veyron vs F1: ''Away from the track, the BAR Honda team used a modified BAR 007 car, which they claim complied with FIA Formula One regulations, to set an unofficial speed record of 413 km/h (257 mph) on a one way straight line run on 6 November 2005 during a shakedown ahead of their Bonneville 400 record attempt. The car was optimised for top speed with only enough downforce to prevent it from leaving the ground.'' - Wikipedia.
Sep 9, 2011 soulevs Says:
It is still along way off.... but I would still take an F1 car over a McLaren F1
Sep 9, 2011 JHAYTOT1 Says:
modify the mclaren f1 then you got a real f1 car!
Sep 2, 2011 Deredbaron Says:
how is an a-class fast -_-
Sep 1, 2011 PersianLord1995 Says:
i never said courses... i implied a straight road
Sep 1, 2011 hunteran Says:
Uh, no. An F1 car may not have the top end speed of a Veyron, but it would MURDER it in the turns. MUCH more grip, MUCH better handling, and MUCH better acceleration/braking. There are few (if any) courses in the world where you would be spending much time over 200mph (let alone 255mph).
Aug 23, 2011 PersianLord1995 Says:
yet it can easily leave an F1 behind
Aug 19, 2011 mitmotridezbikez Says:
People don't understand f1 cars are for motorsport, not practicability - stop moaning about cup holders and it not being road legal... It was built for speed, veyron was built for speed but not as well as an f1 car for reasons like: headlamps have to be a certain height, nose has to be able to get over speed bumps and you need 2 seats....
Video Details
Ever wondered how fast a F1 car really is... have a look at this... very impressive!! More
Ever wondered how fast a F1 car really is... have a look at this... very impressive!! Less
Post a comment
Local Comments (0)
Youtube Comments (454)
dunhamnumber1 Says:
yeah but a veyron could max out everyday and nothing would go wrong. a gtr has problems with all its owners cuz its cheaply built.
xzzachzx Says:
you guys do relise if f1 cars needed to go faster they would make them faster, f1 cars barely max out at the end of the longest straight, they dont need a bigger engine, its just extra weight
jonteesdale18 Says:
WOW WHAT A PIECE OF FUCKING SHIT!!! THESE CARS ARE COMPLETE GARBAGE AND CAPABLE OF NO REAL POWER!!! I WOULD DRAG MY DICK THROUGH A THOUSAND MILES OF BROKEN GLASS BEFORE I WAS FORCED TO DRIVE SUCH INFERIOR CAR!! I OWN A 2000 HONDA CIVIC TURBO AND I PUT 300 TO THE WHEELS AND ONLY WEIGHING 2000LBS I WOULD DESTROY THIS PILE OF SHIT!! YOUR CARS LAME FUCKING FAGGOT!!!!!
maltonbranch Says:
Add 30k to a GTR and it will destroy a veyron. Veyrons power to weight ratio is dogshit. too heavy
V8Paul Says:
Gear an f1 car differently and it will destroy the veyron top speed. Veyron is flash cash motoring with little point to it.
BluntToy Says:
@PJPs911 F1 is quicker then the veyron everywhere but top speed. not too sure about acceleration, i think the f1 has a better 0-100 but 0-300 i dont know who wins
Prfactist Says:
It makes no sense to compare an F1 car with a Veyron, an IndyCar or anything because they are designed to do completely different things.
JonasTh33 Says:
The Veyron is the faster car, but only on the straights
jamiroquai01fan Says:
Plus the f1 car was on a wet/damp track haha. :)
mattieboi4 Says:
An F1 car can accelerate from 0 to 160kph & back to 0 in 4 seconds! Veyron what? It's not even a competition, how can they be mentioned in the same sentence. Try reading then commenting ppl.
Tommovdv Says:
@MrAngelmann go away amerifag no one is better then murray walker.
thornrev Says:
when did a mercedes a-class became a fast car
WeeManDaredevil Says:
@MrAngelmann No non-super car sports car on the planet could come close to one of these
Zigadiboom Says:
0:08 "Hop-STIG Guitars give staggeringly short breaking distance"
jayhawk2000 Says:
omfg.... owned..
XcopeS Says:
Well, it looks like there are lots of them here.
kallo182 Says:
F1 Car = 605Kg / 765Hp Veyron= 1800Kg/ 1000Hp F1 Car 0.78Kg/Hp, Veyron 1.8Kg/Hp Only Clueless 16 year old Children think the Veyron is faster than F1.
XcopeS Says:
To people arguing about Veyron vs F1: ''Away from the track, the BAR Honda team used a modified BAR 007 car, which they claim complied with FIA Formula One regulations, to set an unofficial speed record of 413 km/h (257 mph) on a one way straight line run on 6 November 2005 during a shakedown ahead of their Bonneville 400 record attempt. The car was optimised for top speed with only enough downforce to prevent it from leaving the ground.'' - Wikipedia.
soulevs Says:
It is still along way off.... but I would still take an F1 car over a McLaren F1
JHAYTOT1 Says:
modify the mclaren f1 then you got a real f1 car!
Deredbaron Says:
how is an a-class fast -_-
PersianLord1995 Says:
i never said courses... i implied a straight road
hunteran Says:
Uh, no. An F1 car may not have the top end speed of a Veyron, but it would MURDER it in the turns. MUCH more grip, MUCH better handling, and MUCH better acceleration/braking. There are few (if any) courses in the world where you would be spending much time over 200mph (let alone 255mph).
PersianLord1995 Says:
yet it can easily leave an F1 behind
mitmotridezbikez Says:
People don't understand f1 cars are for motorsport, not practicability - stop moaning about cup holders and it not being road legal... It was built for speed, veyron was built for speed but not as well as an f1 car for reasons like: headlamps have to be a certain height, nose has to be able to get over speed bumps and you need 2 seats....